Various channels claim that rebalancing your stock portfolio increases your return on investment. In this article, I will present the analysis of historical data on geographic allocations of the popular indices MSCI World and MSCI Emerging Markets.
2 remarks before we start:
This article was translated from German to English in collaboration between man and machine *To be honest, I was a little disappointed by the translation performance of translate.google.com. Even though I am talking finance in this article, I’m not a finance expert at all. I’m just a private individual who is interested in their own pension scheme and other financial topics. So I accumulate solid half-knowledge and rely on my more or less common sense and program a calculator1,2 every now and then. Let a world portfolio be given Suppose a person, let’s call her Elisa, wants to benefit from the global capital market for her retirement. Her effort should be as limited as possible. Now Elisa hears that ETFs can be used to easily benefit from profits of public companies all around the world. An index called MSCI ACWI and ETFs that try to replicate this seem suitable to Elisa at first glance. However, Elisa notes that the MSCI ACWI includes more than 50% shares in US companies. Represent the US really half the global economy? Following the criterion of market capitalization used here, definitively. There are other criteria for tracking the global economy, see, e.g., Justetf. A popular alternative to 100% ACWI includes the MSCI World Index at 70% and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index at 30%.
...